|
Phylogenetic sequence analysis and improved diagnostic assay systems for viruses of the family Reoviridae (Contract number QLK2-CT-2000-00143)
Agenda and Minutes of 3rd COORDINATION MEETING(Seville, Spain Greece) 10th-11th July 2003
AGENDA
Day 1 WELCOMEADMINISTRATIVE & FINANCIAL MATTERS Peter Mertens
i) The 2nd annual scientific report has been received by Brussels and has been added to the ReoID website (http://www.reoviridae.org/dsRNA_virus_proteins/ReoID/annual-reports.htm) As soon as this has been reviewed I will send Partners news.
ii) The 3rd-annual / final scientific report would normally be required in Brussels by the end of February 2004. However I have applied for a 10 month extension to the grant (with no extra funds). This will allow partners to continue the employment of staff until the available funding has been used up. If this application is successful, which now seems very likely, we will delay the final report till December 2004. However an annual report will still be required in February 2004. Please send your individual reports directly to Peter Mertens at IAH-Pirbright before the end of January 2003. (Please read the attached document to find the information that you are required to provide) As co-ordinator I will assemble your reports into the scientific report for the whole contract and will submit it to Brussels during February 2004.
iii) The third 12-monthly cost statement required in Brussels by end of February 2003. Please send your individual reports directly to Mr John Mottram at IAH-Compton (copies to Peter Mertens at IAH Pirbright) before the end of January 2003 who will use your reports to assemble the financial report for the contract as a whole and submit them to Brussels. Should your own finance officer anticipate difficulties in completing your cost statement then s/he should contact Mr Mottram directly (tel. 00 44 1635 578 411, fax 00 44 1635 577 237, e-mail john.mottram@bbsrc.ac.uk).
iv) After acceptance of the cost statements and final scientific reports the Commission will allocate the fourth (and final ) tranche of money (approx 15% of the total) within 2 months to IAH.
v) The anticipated rates of financial allocation from the Commission are as follows: 40% advance . 22.5% at end of 1st year, after acceptance of the relevant scientific reports & 1st cost statement 22.5% at end of 2nd year after acceptance of the relevant scientific reports & 2nd cost statement. (This will be the amount of the final allocation of money) 15% after acceptance of the final reports and cost statements.
WORK PROGRAMMESCIENTIFIC REPORTSOVERVIEW : work carried out in the first two years of the project:
Peter Mertens: Web sites and Reference collection ICTV databaseThe development of the ReoID and dsRNA virus web sites will be described, including lists of viruses, primers, phylogenetic trees and project documents will be briefly described. ICTV database (see http://www.ictvdb.iacr.ac.uk/Tutorial/tt_virin.htm)
COFFEE (10.30 – 11.00)
Partner 1: IAH-Orbivirus group (40 mins*) Alan Samuel, Sushila Maan* Karam Singh, Shujing Rao, Peter Mertens, (*Sushila Maan and Karam Singh will not be attending the meeting) Recent work at IAH Pirbright will be described, concerning sequencing of BTV genome segment 2 and 6Presenter: Alan SamuelDiscussionPartner 5: Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, (40 mins*) S10 SEGMENT SEQUENCE ANALYSIS OF GREEK BTV FIELD STRAINSNikolakaki S. V, Nomikou K, Koumbati M. Presenter(s)
Partner 1: Sequencing studies of segment 10 (20mins)Presenters : Rachel O'Hara* Peter Mertens: (* Rachel O'Hara will not be attending the meeting) Discussion
LUNCH (12.30 – 2.00)Recent work at IAH Pirbright will be described, concerning sequencing of the genomes of previously uncharacterized virusesPresenter : Shujing Rao Discussion
Partner 3: Maisons Alfort (40 mins*)Stéphan Zientara, Corinne Sailleau and Emmanuel BréardReporting progress on BTV and EHDV (Information concerning latest developments in: PCR, vaccine, recombinant protein, isolation of EHDV) Presenter(s): Stéphan Zientara, Discussion Partner 2: Univesite de Marseille (40 mins*) Xavier de Lamballerie Houssam AttouiEvolution, Taxonomy and protein expression of selected members of the family Reoviridae Sequencing of members of genera coltivirus and aquareovirus Presenter(s) Discussion
Partner 4: C.S.I.C. U.A.M. Cantoblanco, Madrid, (40 mins*) Presenter(s) ADJOURNMENT
Day 2 (Day 4 of the joint EU projects meeting) Discussion of Future Developments and continued scientific linksWork PackagesWP 1: Set up virus reference collectionsCompletion Date: Month 36Partners involved: 1, 2, 4,
Deliverables partly or wholly within the first 24 months of projectD1 Set up initial orbivirus reference collection and storage by month 12D2 Set up initial reference Seadornavirus / coltivirus collection and storage by month 12D3 Set up initial Aquareovirus reference collection and storage by month 12D19 Add viruses cDNA clones and antibodies to reference collections by month 36
Milestones1.Set up and maintain reference collections for the orbiviruses,2.Set up and maintain reference collections for the seadornaviruses / coltiviruses3.Set up and maintain reference collections for the aquareoviruses.Suggested areas of discussion
The current status of the current collections Sources of additional virus isolates Appropriate documentation for virus isolates Availability of materials (RNA, Isolates, clones, antibodies)
Notes
WP 2: Genome sequence analyses for seadornaviruses and coltivirusesCompletion Date: Month 36Partner Responsible: 2Partners involved: 1 (IAH) , 2, 4,Deliverables partly or wholly within the first 24 months of projectD4 Generate cDNA clones and a full genome sequence By month 12 for a representative coltivirusD11 Generate cDNA clones and a full genome sequence for By Month 24a representative SeadornavirusD18 Phylogenetic comparisons of seadornavirus and coltivirus RNA sequences By month 36
Milestones 1. Generate and sequence cDNA clones for the full genome of a Seadornavirus 2. Generate and sequence cDNA clones for the full genome of a Coltivirus 3. Generate and sequence cDNA clones for the Pol and T2 genes of other seadornaviruses and coltiviruses Suggested areas of discussion
Current and planned sequencing studies with the seadornaviruses and coltivirusesNotes
WP 3: Virus genome sequence analyses for aquareovirusesCompletion Date: Month 36Partners Responsible: 4, 2
Deliverables partly or wholly within the first 24 months of project
D16 Generate cDNA clones and a full genome sequence for By month 36a representative aquareovirus.D18 Phylogenetic comparisons of Aquareovirus RNA sequences By month 36
Milestones
1. Generate and characterise cDNA clones for the whole Aquareovirus A genome 2. Generate and characterise cDNA clones for the Pol and T2 genes of the other Aquareovirus species 3. Generate and characterise cDNA clones for the Pol and T2 genes of the five currently unassigned aquareovirus isolates and any new isolates that become available
Suggested areas of discussion
Current and planned sequencing studies with the aquareoviruses
Notes
|
Contract number: (include reference to complementary contracts–e.g. fellowships, INCO) |
Title of the project: (as in the contract) |
Acronym of the project: (as in the contract) |
Type of contract: (e.g. RTD project, demonstration project, thematic network, concerted action…) |
QoL action line: (state to which key action, generic activity etc this contract belongs) |
Commencement date: (DD/MM/YY: normally the first day of the month following the signature by all parties, unless otherwise stated in the contract) |
Duration: (in months) |
Total project costs: (in euro) |
EU contribution: (in euro) |
Project co-ordinator: · Name (including title): · Organisation: · Postal address:
· Telephone: · Telefax: · e-mail: |
Keywords: ( list up to five keywords that best describe the project) |
World wide web address: (Internet address where regularly updated information on the project can be obtained) |
List of participants: (provide same details as for the co-ordinator)
|
SECTION II: PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT
(please start with a table of contents)
1. OVERVIEW OF PROGRESS DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD (typically up to four pages, excluding tables)
- Summarise the main objectives of the project for this reporting period.
- Provide an overview of the scientific progress of the project as a whole in the period, highlighting any significant scientific achievements and, where relevant, their potential social and economic impact.
- Compare the progress achieved against the activities planned for the period, indicating significant difficulties or delays encountered the activities thus affected and actions taken to remedy them.
- Provide an update of tables 1, 2, and 3 from the technical annex of your contract, concerning deliverables, work packages and milestones, indicating in these updated tables the current status of the relevant tasks.
2. STATUS OF THE INDIVIDUAL WORK PACKAGES (typically up to one page per work package)
- Summarise the main objectives of the work package for this reporting period.
- Compare the actual work accomplished against the activities planned, explaining any major deviations and the actions taken to remedy them.
- Provide an indication of resources used during the period.
3. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PARTICIPANTS (typically up to one page per participant)
- Describe the contribution of each participant in sufficient detail to justify its cost claim for the reporting period, noting in particular the personnel and other resources deployed on the project.
- Indicate any significant problems encountered and the actions taken to remedy them.
- Indicate any changes to the scientific team during the period.
- Report on any activity by subcontractors during the period.
4. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CO-ORDINATION (typically up to one page)
- Outline major project co-ordination activities during the period, in particular the development of electronic communication systems and plenary meetings. Please attach the minutes of all plenary meetings.
- Provide in tabular form the actual and planned allocation of human resources to the project, analysed by work package and by participant.
5. EXPLOITATION AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES
- Indicate progress towards exploitation of the project results, providing an update on patent activity, if any.
- Describe your major dissemination activities during the period (project web-site, press releases, conferences, workshops, industrial platforms etc).
- Provide the list of publications directly emanating from the project during the period, highlighting both joint publications between the participants and publications appearing in refereed journals. Please annex a copy of each publication. (Note: these publications should acknowledge support from the European Commission and specify the contract number). Joint publications (publications involving at least two participants) should be clearly identified. Include, as annex, one paper copy of all publications included in the list.
In order to help with its own dissemination activities, the Commission would also appreciate receiving copies of any posters suitable for a wider audience and of any press release relevant to the project.
6. ETHICAL ASPECTS AND SAFETY PROVISIONS
- Describe any significant ethical and safety issues arising during the period, in particular any activities needed to comply with the contract.
7. MID-TERM REVIEW
- If the mid-term review will take place before the next periodic report is presented, indicate the planned date for the review and any preparations that have taken place for it. (Note: a manual concerning the organisation of mid-term reviews is available from your project officer).
- If the mid-term review has taken place, discuss how any recommendations from that review are being progressed.
8. PLANS FOR THE NEXT REPORTING PERIOD
- Summarise your plans and the main objectives of the project for the next reporting period, taking account of any difficulties or delays already encountered.
- Indicate planned dates for plenary meetings.
9. REQUESTS TO THE COMMISSION
- If you consider that a contract modification is needed (or is likely to be needed at some later date), please explain. (Note: late or unexpected requests for contract modifications can not always be handled.)
SECTION III: SCHEMATIC DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
This text (one page maximum) should provide an updated description of the project, written in a way that can be understood by non-specialists in the field. It should include only information that can be published.
Overall objectives of the project:
|
Experimental approach and working method:
|
Achievements and results to date:
|
The two most relevant publications emanating from the project:
|
Abstracts
The Phylogenetic trees currently displayed on the website are in the process of being updated (See: http://www.reoviridae.org/dsRNA_virus_proteins/orbivirus-phylogenetic-trees.htm)
The ICTV and The international sequence databases have recognized that a significant proportion of the sequence data currently available is from nucleic acids of insufficiently well defined origins. In order to counteract these problems ICTV has set up a 'database' * to hold information concerning individual virus isolates. Each virus entered will be given a unique identification number that can then be used permanently to identify it or search for information. The new database will hold isolation data and provide links automatically to sequence data, publications, Reference collections and any other sources of information that are available via the web.
(see (http://www.ictvdb.iacr.ac.uk/Tutorial/tt_virin.htm (may not work in Netscape).
The ICTV has agreed to press authors and publishers of the major Scientific Journals) to include the unique reference number for all viruses included in publications. This may well lead to the submission of virus data becoming a normal pre-publication requirement, in much the same way as getting accession numbers is for sequence data. We have already started to create links between the ReoID orbivirus collection data and ICTVdb, which we plan to expand over the final year of the project. We anticipate this will add to the value of the reference collection and will provide a better link to publications/sequences and other useful data for individual isolates.
( *Note: P. Mertens is now a member of the ICTV database Sub Committee)
Sushila Maan* Karam Singh*, Alan Samuel, Shujing Rao, Peter Mertens: Recent work at IAH Pirbright will be described, concerning sequencing of BTV genome segment 2 and 6
The complete nucleotide sequence of genome segment 6 from all 24 BTV serotypes was also analyzed, providing information on sequence variation and its correlation with virus serotype. Differences between the vaccine and field isolates of BTV were also examined and may be sufficient to design RT-PCR primers to distinguish them. Similar methods are being used as the basis for serotype specific RT-PCR assays, to improve the speed and reliability of BTV serotype determination. The sequences generated will be added to those already available for the segments of different BTV serotypes in the international databases and listed at: www.reoviridae.org/dsRNA_virus_proteins/btv_sequences.htm.
Nikolakaki S. V, Nomikou K, Koumbati M.
Sequence analysis of the NS3/NS3A gene of Greek isolates from the 1979-2001 epizootics will be presented.
The sequences of the S10 gene of BTV field strains of serotypes BTV1, BTV4, BTV9 and BTV 16, were determined to define the molecular epidemiology of BTV infection in Greece.
Phylogenetic analysis segregated the Greek BT viruses into two monophyletic groups.
The first group, consisting of strains of serotype 4, presented high percentage of homology (98-100%) irrespective of the area and the year of isolation and were close to the Tunisian and the Corsican strains. The second group consisting of strains of serotype 1, 9 and 16, on the other hand, showed 97-99% homology and were closer to the Chinese, Australian and South African strains.
From the above results it may be concluded that two different groups of BTV strains seemed to coexist in Greece during the epizootics of 1979-2001.
NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE ANALYSIS OF GENOME SEGMENT 10 FROM BLUETONGUE VIRUSES ISOLATED IN THE CURRENT EUROPEAN OUTBREAK
O’Hara, R.S., Rao, S., and Mertens, P.P.C.,
Institute For Animal Health, Pirbright Laboratory,
Ash Road, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF(UK)
Seasonal outbreaks of Bluetongue disease have occurred across southern and eastern Europe since 1998. Five serotypes (1, 2, 4, 9 and 16) have recently been reported in Europe and the virus has extended its range northwards, into areas never previously affected by the disease, which do not support populations of C.imicola (the principal southern European and north African vector). This indicates that the virus is being transmitted by an alternative (new) vector (possibly C. pulicaris or C. obsoletus), which are widely distributed across north Western Europe. Virus isolates (of different serotypes) were obtained from several European countries. Viral dsRNA was extracted and its RNA electropherotype analysed by SDS-PAGE. Segment 10 was amplified by RT-PCR, before sequencing using a Beckman capillary sequencer. Full-length sequences were aligned and compared to existing sequences (held on the EMBL) database using the BioEdit sequence alignment editor, ClustalX and TreeView. Segment 10 sequences from current European field strains were found to cluster within only 2 groups, which vary (between groups) by 15 – 20%. These differences are independent of serotype, but showed some correlation with geographic origin. Initial analyses also indicate some correlation with the insect vector species involved in transmission. Comparisons of genome segment 2 and 10 from European isolates, provide evidence for genome segment reassortment in the field.
Presenting Author is underlined
cDNA Synthesis, Cloning and Sequencing of the Complete Genomes of Previously Uncharacterized or Unassigned Orbiviruses
Shujing Rao , Adam Meyer, Alan Samuel, Houssam Attoui, Peter P. C Mertens,
Institute For Animal Health, Pirbright Laboratory, Ash Road, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF(UK)
New viruses within genera Seadornavirus
and Orbivirus isolated from mosquitoes obtained from China
and
Diagnostic assays for viruses of genera Coltivirus and Seadornavirus
Houssam Attoui
Two viruses with dsRNA segmented genome profiles were isolated from mosquitoes in China.
The first virus was isolated from Aedes dorsalis mosquitoes and contained 12 segments of dsRNA. Sequence analysis has shown that this virus is a new species of genus Seadornavirus. This virus was designated “Liao ning virus”. Amino acid identities between homologous genes of either banna virus or kadipiro virus ranged between 18 and 42%. The genome of LNV had higher G+C content that those of BAV or KDV. The conserved terminal sequences of this virus differed from those of either BAV or KDV
The other virus was isolated from Culex tritaeniorhynchus mosquitoes and contained 10 segments of dsRNA. Sequence analysis has shown that this virus is a new species of genus Orbivirus. This virus was designated “Yunnan orbivirus”. Amino acid identities between homologous genes of either Banna virus or St Croix river virus ranged between 20 and 49%.
The consereved terminal sequence of this virus were found similar to those of other orbiviruses. The T2 protein of this virus is the VP2 as it is the case for tick borne orbiviruses (BRDV and SCRV).
Diagnostic assays based on expressed recombinant proteins were validated on human and immunised animal samples for Colorado tick fever, Eyach and Banna viruses.
An example of data submission to the ICTV database
(DRAFT Copy)
00.060.0.02.003.02.109.001. Bluetongue virus type 2 ITL02/07
Cite this description as: Peter P. C. Mertens (2003) 00.060.0.02.003.02.109.001. Bluetongue virus type 2ITL02/07. In: ICTVdB - The Universal Virus Database, version 3. Büchen-Osmond, C. (Ed), ICTVdB Management, The Earth Institute at Columbia, Biosphere 2 Center, Columbia University, Oracle, AZ, USA
Isolate designation: ITL02/07.
Isolation date: 18 July; 2002.
Location: S. Angelo di Brolo, Sicily, Italy.
Source of isolate: Sheep.
Virus was isolated by Ms Giuseppina Alimena, IZS Palermo, N.A., Palermo, Sicily, Italy.
Involved in the submission of the isolate was also Dr. Annalisa Guercio; IZS Palermo.
Classification
This is a description of an invertebrate, or vertebrate virus at the isolate level.
ICTVdB Virus Code: 00.060.0.02.003.02.109.001. Virus accession number: 3EAF0E9A.
Biocontainment Level
Health authorities recommend to handle this virus at the biocontainment level BSL-3.
Name, Synonyms and Lineage
Acronym(s): BTV-2/ITL02/07. Virus is assigned to the serotype and species 00.060.0.02.003. Bluetongue virus 00.060.0.02.003.02. serotype 2; genus 00.060.0.02. Orbivirus; family 00.060 Reoviridae; not assigned to an order.
Depositories and Collections
The isolate has been deposited and is available at an institution at Orbivirus Collection, Pirbright Laboratory, Institute for Animal Health and is listed in the catalogue with the reference number ITL02/07.
Virions have a simple construction and consist of a capsid. Capsid/nucleocapsid is round. The capsid.
The genome is segmented; consists of ten segments of linear double-stranded RNA. The complete genome is 19216 nucleotides long <Genome size is estimated from electrophoretic migration pattern>. The negative-sense or non-coding strand (complementary to the viral mRNA) is full-length. The 5'–terminal sequence has conserved regions. The 3'–terminus has conserved nucleotide sequences; of 6 nucleotides in length.
Natural Host Range
Viral hosts belong to the Domain Eucarya.
Domain Eucarya
Kingdom Animalia.
Kingdom Animalia
Phylum Chordata.
Phylum Arthropoda
Subphylum Vertebrata.
Phylum Chordata, Subphylum Vertebrata
Class Mammalia.
Class Mammalia
Order Artiodactyla;
Family Bovidae:; Subfamily Caprinae; virus infects Genus Ovis
aries (sheep).
Pathology
The virus can be detected best in spleen.
The virus is known to occur in Mediterranean regions; viral host lives under aerobic conditions; viral host lives in the atmosphere. The viral host is found in a undisturbed environment yet with signs of human disturbance; an agricultural environment. The virus occurs in Italy.
Data Sources and Contributions
Virus description on the Web
http://www.reoviridae.org/dsRNA_virus_proteins/ReoID/viruses-at-iah.htm - ITL02/07. For further information on virus please contact the Study Group (SG) chair (see at ICTV web page).
Contributor
Data have been submitted online to ICTVdB on 29–04–2003;
by
Peter P. C. Mertens
Institute for Animal Health, Department of Molecular
Biology
Ash Road Pirbright
Woking; Surrey; GU24 0NF
UK
Tel: + +44 1483 231017.
Fax: + +44 1483 232448.
Email:
peter.mertens@bbsrc.ac.uk.
This is a description from ICTVdB: the Universal Virus Database of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses.
Copyright © 2002. International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. All rights reserved.
Phylogenetic sequence analysis and improved diagnostic assay systems for viruses of the family Reoviridae
(Contract number QLK2-CT-2000-00143)
MINUTES OF THE 4th COORDINATION MEETING
(Seville, Spain, 10-11th July 2003)
Participants
Maria Koubati-Artopiou University of Thessaloniki Partner 5
Kiki Nomikou “ “
Stephan Zientara AFSSA Maisons Alfort Partner 3
Emmanuel Briard “ “
Corrinne “ “
Houssam Attoui University of Marseille Partner 2
Paqco Rodriguez Madrid Partner 4
Shujing Rao IAH Pirbright Partner 1
Alan Samuel “ “
Peter Mertens “ “ Co-ordinator
Welcome (Peter Mertens)
Professor Mertens welcomed the participants and thanked Paco Rodriguez for organising the venue in Seville. Apologies for absence were recieved from Dr Rachel O’Hara and Dr Philip Mellor (IAH Pirbright) and Dr Xavier De Lamballeries ( University of Marseille).
Financial matters
Professor Mertens reported that the scientific report for year 2 had been received by Isabel Minguez in Brussels and that she was currently reviewing it. As soon as any news is received concerning its acceptance Professor Mertens promised to forward this to the ReoID partnership
Professor Mertens reported that all partners had received the initial tranche of 40% funding, but only Marseille (partner 2 ) had been paid the second amount of money (end of year 1) which had been paid by the administration of Partner 1 even though these funds have not yet been received from Brussels.
The reasons that funding for the start of year 2 (25%) and year 3 (20%) have not yet been released by the Commission is that satisfactory financial reports have not yet been received for year 1 and year 2 from either Maisons Alfort or the University of Marseille. As a result none of the funding for any partner for year 1 and 2 has been received. The financial reports from Partners 4 and 5 have been received by IAH (Mike Baker) and are acceptable. The delay in funding is therefore due to lack of reports from partners 2 and 3 only (University of Marseille and AFSSA Maisons Alfort).
Professor Mertens Urged both Dr Zientara and Dr Attoui to contact their respective financial representatives to ensure that these financial reports were delivered to IAH as soon as possible. They both reported that they had already received several requests for the correct documents from Mike Baker (financial officer at IAH) and agreed to contact their finance departments with these requests as a matter of urgency. However they also reported that since they were not in control of their financial departments it might be also necessary for Professor Mertens as Co-ordinator to send demands for these statements to the financial officers and senior management of both organisations, reporting that these oversights were now becoming a serious embarrassment and might in his opinion affect future funding from the EU.
Professor Mertens reported that he had requested a 10 month extension to the project (with no additional funding) to allow each of the partners to spend the funds that had been awarded to them. Isabel Minguez has agreed to work on this request over the coming week and it is hoped that a reply will be received very soon.
If the application is successful it would mean that the proposed annual meeting in May 2004, will not be the final meeting, which will then be required in late 2004/early 2005.
Professor Mertens also reported plans to have a joint final meeting between the three current EU grants co-ordinated from IAH Pirbright (the ReoID grant, The BTV vaccine grant and The culicoides Risk assessment grant) This meeting is planned for early/mid 2005 and Peter Mertens & Philip Mellor will discuss provision of some support funding for this as an international meeting with the commission. Archives of Virology has already agreed to publish proceedings of such a meeting as a book (supplement to the Journal) similar to that published for an AHSV meeting held in Morocco after the EU AHSV grants.
Scientific Reports
1. Peter Mertens, Web sites, Reference collections & the ICTV database
Professor Mertens reported that he has been invited to present a plenary lecture to the dsRNA virus Symposium in Tuscany September 2003, concerning the molecular epidemiology of BTV in Europe. He suggested that it would be appropriate to use this opportunity to report the major scientific observations concerning BTV that have been derived from the ReoID grant and would therefore like to use data from all partners (with appropriate acknowledgements) for this report. He would also report the construction of sequence databases for segments 2, 6 and 10 from different serotypes. The partners agreed with these proposals and would supply any relevant data required.
Pages from the dsRNA virus website (providing details on viral proteins/RNAs) will be included in an information book to be published for the Tuscany meeting.
Professor Mertens reported that tables of primers for the amplification, detection and identification of BTV genome segment 2 from European vaccine and field strains (BTV 1, 2, 4, 9 and 16) have been added to the ReoID web pages and are therefore, widely available. It was agreed that these pages will be edited and circulated to the different partners for addition of other primers (developed by other members of the partnership) and comment on primer efficiency/discrimination etc. The revised tables will then be posted on the web site.
Professor Mertens reported his intention to add agarose genome profiles for representative species of the family Reoviridae, to the website, thereby providing an additional aid to virus identification. It was agreed by the partnership that this would be valuable and where possible they would provide relevant images.
Professor Mertens reported that the Israeli Veterinary Services had greed to send recent Israeli isolates of BTV to the ReoID reference collection at IAH Pirbright. Initial communications suggest that this will include 20-30 isolates made over the last 3-4 years. Negotiations are also underway with senior management at CSIRO, Geelong in Australia to provide multiple isolates of different Australian orbiviruses, including particularly, a complete collection of Australian EHDV isolates. These will be use for sequencing studies similar to those already being conducted for BTV. It is anticipated that this will provide a data base for the identification and molecular epidemiology of EHDV. In view of partner 3’s specific interest in EHDV, these studies will be conducted primarily by partner 1 but in association with partner 3.
It was also reported that after the successful analysis of the Peruvian horse sickness virus (PHSV) genome, there is considerable interest from South American Colleagues in continued collaboration with IAH Pirbright and other members of the partnership. In order to support such links Professor Mertens will explore funding opportunities to allow South American colleagues to visit and work at Pirbright (e.g. Wellcome travelling fellowship grants). It is hoped that Anna Hurtado will be able to come to Pirbright, bringing a collection of uncharacterised South American orbiviruses with her for sequencing and expression studies. This would provide a valuable continuation of the work and useful additional isolates/data for the reference collection/sequence databases.
ICTV database: Professor Mertens provided a brief report on the development of a virus isolate database by ICTV, after attending the ICTV database subcommittee meeting in St Louis (Professor Mertens is now a member of this committee). It becomes clear that both ICTV and EMBL are concerned that much of the sequence data that is currently available is derived from nucleic acids of poorly or inadequately defined origins, reducing the overall value of these data. Initial estimates suggest that 65% of available sequences are inadequately identified. As a result ICTV have set up databases to record and identify individual virus isolates. This will be available via the internet and will include links (automatically updated) to other sources of information (sequences publications, reference collections etc).
Each Virus strain will be given a unique reference number to identify it and act as a identification mechanism in other data sources (e.g sequence databases publications etc). Since each virus strain data entry will be refereed by the relevant ICTV study group it may be considered as a refereed publication in its own right.
An example of information required was provided. If access to the database is required an internet search using ICTVdb will find the relevant site.
Home base: http://ictvdb.bio2.edu/
USA site: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ICTVdb/
UK site: http://www.ictvdb.iacr.ac.uk/
China site: http://www1.im.ac.cn/ictvdb/welcome.htm
Contributors will need to register and obtain a password but are then free to add data on individual virus isolates.
Professor Mertens reported ICTV’s intention to ask both the sequence databases and the editors of Virology journals to make incorporation of the ICTVdb number a requirement for submission or publication of data concerning any new virus isolate (in much the same way as accession numbers are usually required before publication of sequences). It is anticipated that this will lead to much greater uptake and acceptance of the ICTVdb system for virus strain identification. Professor Mertens reported that he would add data for each isolate in the ReoID reference collection and obtain relevant strain identification numbers.
Dr Rodriguez asked Prof. Mertens if entering details of a virus isolate onto the ICTV data base would commit the author/contributor to giving that isolate to other people (in a manner similar to that implied by publication in refereed journals) . Prof. Mertens replied that these issues had not yet been discussed at ICTVdb but decisions would have to be made in the near future. He said that he would bring this matter up at the next ICTV db meeting.
Dr Rodriguez also asked whether, (in consideration of bio-terrorism) it was ‘safe’ to put sequence data for these viruses in the public domain. In reply Prof Mertens pointed out that such sequence data were already available for many important pathogens via the international databases and the matter was one for consideration by international agencies rather than by the ReoID partnership alone. It is currently normal practice to submit such data to the international sequence databases.
Prof. Mertens also reported that a colleague at Pirbright had questioned whether data concerning virus isolates and reference collections should be put on open websites. However it is evident that containment laboratories such as Pirbright must have sources of relevant virus pathogens. The details of which specific strain are held are of secondary consideration and do not therefore represent a significant additional risk. Indeed the availability of these data may contribute significantly to disease control programmes, which is clearly desirable .
Alan Samuel Suhila Maan, Karam Singh, Shujing Rao Rachel O Hara, & Peter Mertens, Phylogenetic Analysis of Segment 2 & 6 of BTV.
In subsequent discussions: Professor Mertens reported that the trees that had been shown for all 24 BTV serotypes and for multiple individual isolates of BTV 1, 2, 4, 9 and 16 had been placed or would appear on the ReoID website in the near future.
The data presented by Dr Samuel was discussed and it was concluded that from comparisons of the genome segment 2 sequences, the Turkish BTV-4 vaccine is only distantly related to recent BTV-4 field isolates from Greece. It is therefore considered unlikely that the Turkish vaccine strain and vaccination campaign were responsible for these outbreaks. However, it was also shown that at least in genome segments 2 and 6 the South African and Turkish vaccine strains are very closely related.
Coffee 11:15am
Presentation Maria
Segment 10 data, 2x Monophyletic group Some were related to Far Eastern strains whilst others were more related to strains from the Middle East.
There was a brief discussion on who has been sequencing segment 10 and Maria said that the Italians (Dr Savinni) have been sequencing the S10 of an Israeli strain. Dr Zientara said that the S2 nd S10 were identical to the Corsican strain.
Presentation . Prof. Mertens S10 analysis.
Discussion Kiki made some corrections to the distribution and incidence of BTV types in Europe over the last 5 years. Kiki said that she had tested some 5000 sera, collected from all over Greece, for EHDV and AHS and that they were all negative.
Kiki also mentioned that Turkey are vaccinating against Rinderpest PPR (Clarification of this matter should be sought from Dr Anderson and Prof. Barrett at Pirbright.
PAGE analysis has revealed additional bands in several virus isolates, including the South African vaccine strains. This highlights the fact that these isolates / vaccines are not cloned and confirms that mixed virus populations can exist (Quite often) in cell culture grown viruses.
There was some discussion concerning the generation of two distinct sequences for segment 10 of the Lesbos BTV-1 isolate. Maria and Kiki reported that the commercial sequencers they used for this isolate had reported that the cDNA contained more than one sequence. This suggests that Rachel’s observation of two segment 10 sequences may be based on a mixed virus population in the original isolate. Because of the relative importance of segment 10 (possible involvement in use of new vector species) it was agreed that Partner 1 (Rachel) would design primers to distinguish the two versions of segment 10 and test original isolate material to be supplied by partner 5 for the presence of each version of seg 10, helping to establish the presence (or not) of a mixed virus population. It was agreed to share these data and publish the segment 10 analyses for the Greek isolates as a joint publication. Maria agreed to write an initial draft to be sent to Peter for correction and addition of extra data.
Presentation Dr Shujing Rao
Discussion
Houssam reported that the cDNA synthesis method developed by Shujing was also entirely effective with ssRNA virus genomes, making it widely applicable and valuable.
Lunch
Presentation Dr Stephan Zientara
Discussion
Stephan reported that the French group had also developed type specific primers for the European BTV strains. During validation tests of these primers (using viral RNA which was supplied by Pirbright) some genome segment 2s from heterologous BTV isolates were amplified in a non-type specific manner. These data suggest the presence of more than one serotype in several isolates, which may either represent genuinely mixed virus populations, or laboratory contamination. Clearly this matter needs to be resolved. Dr Zientara will liase with partner 1, to identify which RNA’s may be Mixtures/contaminated. The sequence data that he has obtained for some of these RNA’s can then be compared to the sequences held on the Pirbright BTV Sequence database. The RNA’s should also be checked with Partner 1’s serotype specific primers to see if the same phenomena are apparent.
Dr Zientara reported detection of EHDV in Reunion Island. This virus had been sent to Pirbright for serological identification. Although a positive match had been found with an isolate from Australia the serotype remains unresolved. Stephan and Peter agreed that such problems could be resolved by development of an EHDV sequence database for genome segment 2 coupled with RT-PCR and sequencing of such new virus isolates. Peter reported that the new Ph.D student (Simon Anthony) at IAH Pirbright would be working specifically on these problems.
It was agreed that Partners 1 and 3 would pool sequence data for genome segment 2 of the European BTV isolates, so that they could be published jointly. Initially Partner 1 agreed to prepare a manuscript for BTV-2 sequences, which will be sent to partner 3 for addition al data and comments prior to joint publication.
Presentation Dr Housam Attoui
Peter congratulated Houssam on the amount of work/progress that he had achieved. Peter confirmed that Unan orbivirus has similar terminal sequences to Peruvian Horse Sickness Virus, suggesting the possibility of a close relationship. As a result it was agreed that Alan or Shujing would send sequences for PHSV to Housam for comparisons. If it is found that there are high levels of similarity, this may indicate that PHSV and YOV are isolates of the same virus species. In this case it was agreed that these data will be submitted as a joint publication.
In order to speed up sequencing studies Partner 1 will send cDNA clones for the larger Ndelle virus genome segments and for the Indian Sheep Orthoreovirus segments to Houssam for sequencing. This will lead to additional joint publications.
Presentation Dr Paco Rodriguez
Due to financial problems only the acquisition of strains continues. Therefore Dr Rodriguez said that he has no further progress to report within the work package. Prof. Mertens stated that if a ten month extension occurs and the money gets to Paco quickly then perhaps a break in progress on the work package would be more acceptable.
A discussion was held on where additional funding could be sought to continue the project and to keep the collaborative links together.
Kiki suggested that perhaps money could be sought for the validation of the diagnostic tests that have been devised.
Work packages over Year 3
As a final discussion It was agreed that work was generally progressing well but that some additional focusing on epidemiological survey work for different viruses in Europe would be required in the later stages of the project. However everything appears to cutrrently be on target, provided the second and third blocks of finance can be got to partners very soon. Professor Mertens promised to deal with this as a matter of priority on his return to Pirbright.
There was some discussion of the time and venue for the next meeting. It was agreed that this should be in May 2004 in Corsica. Dr Zientara and Dr Attoui agreed to help organize the dates and venue.
|